Outrage Over UK Calls to Ban Gluten-free Food Prescriptions

Outrage Over UK Calls to Ban Gluten-free Food Prescriptions

Jefferson Adams

Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. His poems, essays and photographs have appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden’s Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate among others.

He is a member of both the National Writers Union, the International Federation of Journalists, and covers San Francisco Health News for Examiner.com.

View all articles by Jefferson Adams


Are prescriptions the best way to help cealiac sufferers in the UK? Photo: CC–Mike Licht

Celiac.com 03/07/2017 – The Brits are having a bit of a dustup over the best way to help people support with celiac disease.

Currently, Britain’s National Health Service supplies prescriptions for gluten-free food staples for people with celiac disease. Seemingly, no one disagrees with medical experts that celiac suffers should get support from the National Health Service to buy certain staple gluten-free products.

The question, at least from one side of the political spectrum, seems to be whether prescriptions are the best way to provide that support. And that question lies at the heart of the dustup.

In a recent article, the British Medical Journal presents a ‘head to head’ case for and against gluten-free prescriptions on the NHS.

In opposition to prescriptions, James Cave, a GP from Newbury, suggests an alternative would be a national voucher scheme or a personalized health budget for patients, so they receive the difference between the cost of gluten-free products and the prescription.

Matthew Kurien clinical lecturer in gastroenterology, Professor David Sanders, and Sarah Sleet, Chief Executive of Coeliac UK make the case in favor of providing prescription access to gluten-free staple foods, and say that removing prescriptions unfairly discriminates against people with celiac disease.

They explain “targeting gluten-free food prescriptions may reduce costs in the short term but there will be long term costs in terms of patient outcomes.” They also note that there is no other example in the NHS of a disease having its treatment costs cut by 50-100 per cent.

Read more at Plymouth Herald.com.

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).

Related Articles

(Why?)

Published at Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:30:00 +0000

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *